Use case

Build this RFP review workflow.Turn review flags into clearer RFP questions.

See the source-backed workflow, example output, checks, and human-review notes.Draft practical clarifying questions from source-backed review flags, deadlines, and public solicitation context.

Who this helps

Clarifying questions are easier to draft when each question points back to a specific conflict, ambiguity, or missing detail.

What problem this use case solves

Teams can run out of time before the Q&A deadline because review findings are not organized into question-ready notes.

How SourceFlag helps

Surfaces needs-review items tied to public source language.
Helps draft question candidates with context.
Keeps deadline cues visible.
Preserves human review before anything is submitted externally.

When to use this workflow

Use when review flags need to become focused public-RFP Q&A candidates before the deadline.
Use when a question should point to a specific source conflict, ambiguity, missing attachment, or submission instruction.
Use when the team needs human-reviewed wording that does not reveal private strategy.

Copyable table

Synthetic clarifying-question candidates

Example public-source questions for human review before submission.

Synthetic clarifying-question candidates: Example public-source questions for human review before submission.
Issue	Source	Draft question	Owner	Status
Portal versus email submission	Cover page; Section L, p. 10	Please confirm whether final submission is portal-only or whether email delivery is also required.	Proposal Manager	Draft
Missing Attachment J.4	Section L, p. 16	Please confirm whether Attachment J.4 will be provided by amendment or omitted.	Compliance Lead	Needs review
Past performance format	Section L, p. 18; Section M, p. 6	Please confirm whether references must use a required form or may be submitted in offeror format.	Capture Lead	Draft

TSV copy block

Issue	Source	Draft question	Owner	Status
Portal versus email submission	Cover page; Section L, p. 10	Please confirm whether final submission is portal-only or whether email delivery is also required.	Proposal Manager	Draft
Missing Attachment J.4	Section L, p. 16	Please confirm whether Attachment J.4 will be provided by amendment or omitted.	Compliance Lead	Needs review
Past performance format	Section L, p. 18; Section M, p. 6	Please confirm whether references must use a required form or may be submitted in offeror format.	Capture Lead	Draft

What to verify before relying on output

Confirm that each draft question is tied to a public source issue and not to private capture or pricing strategy.
Verify the Q&A deadline, submission method, and any agency instructions about question format.
Route wording through a proposal manager or responsible human reviewer before submission.
Keep restricted, controlled, non-public, private capture, pricing strategy, regulated personal, or sensitive teaming/customer material out of the workspace.

Draft clarifying question

Please confirm whether final submission must be through the portal or by email because the cover page and Section L differ.

Review item

Please confirm whether final submission must be through the portal or by email because the cover page and Section L differ.

Source

Cover page + Section L

Status

Draft

Human review note

Human action: proposal manager reviews wording before submission.

Buyer notes

SourceFlag does not submit questions for you.
Review all question wording with your proposal team.

Product proof

Inspect SourceFlag before choosing a plan.

Source the facts. Flag the risks. Review the product workflow and synthetic sample output before bringing a public solicitation package into a workspace.

See Product See Sample Output

Start from a clearer source-backed workspace.

U.S.-based business customers only. Public and unclassified solicitation materials only. Human review required.

Start a Workspace Compare Pricing