Resource

Use this RFP review guide.Source-backed RFP review guide.

Review the checklist, example, mistakes, and SourceFlag workflow notes.Learn how source-backed RFP review keeps answers, citations, excerpts, flags, and proposal handoff work tied to the original package.

Practical explanation

Source-backed RFP review keeps the answer, citation, excerpt, status, and human-review note close enough to inspect.

Use source-backed review for public solicitation packages where the team needs traceable requirements, deadlines, flags, and drafting context.

Ask grounded questions only against source material that belongs inside the public/unclassified boundary.

Treat answers as review inputs that can be wrong, incomplete, outdated, incorrectly cited, or misapplied.

Copyable table

Copyable source-backed review table

Synthetic examples of grounded review work.

Copyable source-backed review table: Synthetic examples of grounded review work.
Review task	Source citation/location	Answer or context	Output	Human verification
Ask about past performance	Section L, p. 18	Past Performance Volume appears required with no more than three references.	Compliance row + drafting cue	Confirm against Section M and amendments.
Find Q&A deadline	Section L, p. 5	Questions due May 29, 2026 at 12:00 PM ET.	Deadline row	Confirm portal method and time zone.
Flag submission conflict	Cover page; Section L, p. 10	Cover page mentions email while Section L mentions portal.	Risk flag + question candidate	Proposal manager decides next action.

TSV copy block

Review task	Source citation/location	Answer or context	Output	Human verification
Ask about past performance	Section L, p. 18	Past Performance Volume appears required with no more than three references.	Compliance row + drafting cue	Confirm against Section M and amendments.
Find Q&A deadline	Section L, p. 5	Questions due May 29, 2026 at 12:00 PM ET.	Deadline row	Confirm portal method and time zone.
Flag submission conflict	Cover page; Section L, p. 10	Cover page mentions email while Section L mentions portal.	Risk flag + question candidate	Proposal manager decides next action.

Synthetic example

Start with public source files.

Review item

Start with public source files.

Source

Synthetic Facilities Support RFP - SF-DEMO-2026-001

Status

Draft

Human review note

This example is public-safe and synthetic; it is not customer data.

Checklist or template

Start with public source files.
Ask grounded questions.
Inspect citations and excerpts.
Create review rows.
Flag needs-review items.
Prepare kickoff and export handoff.
Verify before relying on outputs.

How to use this during RFP review

Step 1: confirm the source package is public, unclassified, and within the SourceFlag boundary.
Step 2: inventory RFP files, amendments, attachments, forms, pricing workbooks, and Q&A documents.
Step 3: ask grounded questions against the public source package and inspect the cited passages.
Step 4: turn reviewed answers into compliance rows, deadline rows, risk flags, clarifying-question candidates, or kickoff notes.
Step 5: verify each output against the original source before using it for drafting or handoff.
Check that every answer has a source citation, owner, status, and human verification note.
Use exports as handoff surfaces, not final proposal approval.
Exclude restricted, non-public, controlled, classified, procurement-sensitive, and regulated personal data.

Common mistakes

Relying on an answer without checking the cited source passage.
Skipping amendments, Q&A responses, attachments, or workbook instructions.
Turning a needs-review flag into proposal direction before a human resolves it.
Uploading restricted, non-public, controlled, classified, procurement-sensitive, or regulated personal data.

How SourceFlag helps

SourceFlag keeps answers, citations, excerpts, review flags, and proposal handoff work tied to the original public solicitation package.
Teams can inspect sample outputs before creating a workspace.
The product is scoped for public and unclassified solicitation packages only, with human review required.

Compliance matrix preview

Past Performance Volume required

Source

Section L, p. 45

Owner / status

Capture Lead / Open

Review note

Confirm recency and relevance rules before final use.

Product proof

See these concepts in the product and sample output.

Source the facts. Flag the risks. Review the product workflow and synthetic sample output before bringing a public solicitation package into a workspace.

See Product See Sample Output

Start from a clearer source-backed workspace.

U.S.-based business customers only. Public and unclassified solicitation materials only. Human review required.

Start a Workspace Compare Pricing